Home » kddtuhwo » Tencent v 360 unfair competition case verdict 360 sentenced to compensate for the loss of 5 million

Tencent v 360 unfair competition case verdict 360 sentenced to compensate for the loss of 5 million

Sina

technology news April 25th afternoon news, Tencent sued Qihoo 360 in case of unfair competition this afternoon in Guangdong Province Higher People’s court pronounced the verdict. Court judge Qihoo 360 constitute unfair competition to the Tencent for compensation of 5 million yuan, and to apologize in the home and the media. Qihoo 360 lawyers said in court will appeal.

The higher people’s Court of Guangdong province

today first instance judgment, the defendant Qihoo 360 constitute unfair competition to the Tencent, a prominent position and need for 15 days on its website home page and other media published an apology.

court believes that the Qihoo 360 "buttoned bodyguard" destruction of Tencent products in the process of the business model and product promotion in the wrong words, derogatory QQ software, thus constituting unfair competition.

court also believes that the Tencent for compensation for economic losses of 125 million yuan but still lacks sufficient basis to determine the Qihoo 360 Tencent for compensation of 5 million yuan.

court dismissed the other claims Tencent, and asked the parties to jointly assume the cost of litigation, including Tencent burden of 166 thousand and 800 yuan, the burden of 500 thousand yuan in 360.

Qihoo 360 lawyer said in court, will appeal. Tencent lawyer said the need to go back to the company and then decided to follow the matter.

Tencent sued Qihoo 360 in case of unfair competition caused by a bodyguard buckle 3Q war launched by Qihoo "". In September 18th last year, the open court, asked the court to stop the development of Tencent, Qihoo, spread and issued 360 buttoned bodyguards software and related behaviors, and to the Qihoo claims 125 million yuan.

4 at the time of the trial is the focus of

: buttoned bodyguards damage QQ software integrity, remove the plug-in machine screen advertisement count failure mode, negative evaluation of whether a commercial reputation slander, buttoned bodyguards whether by QQ software. Tencent and Qihoo lawyers in a fierce debate in the field, but not in court for sentencing.

in the last month, with the case related to the Qihoo 360 sued Tencent monopoly case verdict, the Guangdong Provincial Higher People’s court dismissed all claims that the company of Qihoo, Tencent Inc do not constitute a monopoly. Qihoo 360 said later that the company has filed an appeal to the Supreme People’s court.

 

360 statement: there is a place for the protection of the court to appeal to the Supreme Court

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*